Aquele que fala por falar, pretendendo saber o que fala e dizer algo com tutano, quando o vazio daquilo que diz se destaca. Vejam o exemplo de um professor de diplomacia de Harvard:"More alarming is the drumbeat by some senior Israelis for a unilateral military strike as early as summer 2011. I have long believed the cost of such a decision would far outweigh its possible benefits and would be especially detrimental to the United States(...)Can igniting such a conflict possibly be in the U.S. or Israeli interest? The answer is a clear no. The price is just too high.
The smarter alternative is for President Obama to trust his own instincts and to make clear to Netanyahu that the U.S., rather than Israel, will lead in the international response to the Iranian challenge.(...)it is sensible for the U.S. to test the proposition that talks might possibly lead to a better outcome than war.(...) If negotiations and sanctions fail, as I fear they may, President Obama or his successor will ultimately have to make a brutally tough judgment: go to war to slow down Iran's march toward a nuclear weapons future, or imprison Tehran in a vise of sanctions and military pressure -- containment -- without resort to open armed force."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment