A Lenta Destruição de Los Angeles

Há cem anos atrás Los Angeles era o modelo de cidade a ser seguida, investindo em infra-estrutura como transporte, água e energia, ela atraiu uma vibrante comunidade de negócios. Uma cidade com múltiplos centros, onde grande parte da população vive em casas, numa combinação ótima de bem estar, conforto e eficiência. Infelizmente esse modelo está sendo destruído pela combinação mortal de políticos latinos com interesses comunitários e sindicatos [principalmente de funcionários públicos], pouco conhecimento de negócios e forte inclinação socialista.
The machine that controls Los Angeles these days consists of an alliance between labor and the political leadership of the Latino community, the area’s largest ethnic population. Once virtually powerless in the region, Latinos elected to office now control many of the smaller municipalities along the industrial belt that stretches from downtown to the county line. But since they serve at the whim of labor interests, they seldom speak up for the area’s many small businesses and homeowners. It’s a familiar story: because Democrats are almost assured of victory in L.A.’s general elections, candidates must win only the low-turnout, union-dominated party primaries. John Pérez, a longtime union political operative and now speaker of the California State Assembly, won the Democratic nomination in 2008 with fewer than 5,000 votes and then easily crushed the GOP candidate. Pérez’s predecessor as speaker was Fabian Núñez—another L.A. labor official. No wonder the Sacramento Bee’s Dan Walters calls the labor movement “the closest thing to an omnipotent political machine anywhere in the state.”
The Latino-labor machine has two major priorities: expanding the power of labor unions, particularly in the public sphere; and self-perpetuation. Unsurprisingly, it cares little, and seems to understand less, about L.A.’s economic environment. An excellent example is Mayor Villaraigosa himself, another former labor organizer, whom the machine elevated first to the city council and then to the mayoralty.